this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
992 points (96.4% liked)

memes

14780 readers
4326 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 days ago

Some philosophers agree with biologists on this one.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Am a biologist, can confirm.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A biologist who ignores asexually reproducing organisms, clearly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Humans have tried reproducing asexually. It's called wanking. It doesn't work.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm a philosopher. I can confirm the biologist seems right

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

Ita, fili mi.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Wait, where do I recognise her from, I'm sure I've seen her face before

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

This meme was made better for me by provoking the thought that all the great philosophers were just aces

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Except we have the foresight to know everything will end. Even if we were to produce 100 000 000 perfect replicas of our genes they would still hit the same wall— extinction. Further, whether we have free will or not (prolly not), we're able to coopt the gene platforms to further non-procreative aims.

It's a bit like saying the point of a TV show is to earn profit for the people who bankrolled it. Well, yes that's why it's here and literally the only thing that will keep it going, but you can do a lot more within those constraints than play out the material reality.

So the question remains.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago

Even if we were to produce 100 000 000 perfect replicas of our genes they would still hit the same wall— extinction.

Doesn't matter, had sex.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

What is the meaning of life?

To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their women.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Personally I feel like it is a dumb question. Life gives you meaning. By that I mean life enables the creation of symbolic truths. And what enables life is a different question.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I think almost everybody who isn't a philosopher is with the biologists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

I feel like we would have fewer problems if this were true.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›