I develop software for macOS but am not a game dev. I guess one thing that comes up with my friends who are is that Apple has a proprietary graphics framework called metal that's historically not been easy to adapt to something more cross-platform like vulkan. There has been some progress on that front in terms of them providing some much-requested apis to give better feature parity with third parties, but I don't know where things stand today?
tunetardis
My mom's childhood was partly spent in a war-torn country where they had no choice but to eat crickets for protein. Years later, I showed her an article about how some gourmet restaurants are experimenting with cricket preparations. She looked pensive, and said "They should harvest them from the rice fields. I think the rice-fed ones taste best?"
I'm not a web dev but was chatting with a friend who is, lamenting web 2.0 for pretty much the same reasons as OP. He's like "2.0?!? Where have you been? It's all about web3 and blockchains." Now where was that comfortable old rock I had been hiding under again?
When the www was in its infancy, I thought there needed to be a standardized way to classify content. Something Dewey Decimal System-ish I suppose? But it would need to be easy for casual content providers to use, since the only way it could work would be in at a grass roots, decentralized level where each provider would be responsible for classifying their own content.
Perhaps there could be tools like expert systems that would ask you a number of questions about your data and then link it up appropriately. It could usher in a golden age of library science!
But then everyone went fuck that. Search engines.
I'm almost afraid to ask what Golden Dome is? If it's SDI 2.0, we need to stay away in droves. I think there's some merit in sinking a bit of R&D into dealing with emerging threats like drones, and maybe upgrading the ancient DEW line radars? But if this is another Star Wars missile shield over the entire continent proposal, that was a costly boondoggle in the 80s and I see no reason to believe it wouldn't be one again today.
EVs are generally heavier, meaning more tire wear, so I’m skeptical that the reduction is all that meaningful.
Yeah this was my first thought as well. In the balance, I have no doubt that EVs are better for the environment than ICEVs, but when we're nitpicking about particulates coming out of wear and tear, the weight issue has got to play into that.
In North America, people tend to drive automobiles that are way bigger than they need to be. I have read that this is in part due to auto dealers enjoying larger margins on big vehicles and encouraging this on their clientele. But EVs are different. Bigger means more batteries means more expensive to manufacture. So the sweet spot in terms of profit margins may be something smaller? But whether this will translate into fewer SUVs and pickups on the road I don't know.
Wish car manufacturers never bought up the streetcars and trolleys, they effectively killed public transit in the US pretty early on.
At least it seems light rail is having a moment. I grew up in Toronto where they never did give up on streetcars, though there was a close call (in the 80s I think it was) when the auto lobby tried to have them removed. Fortunately, the mayor at the time was a huge fan. And now it seems the street cars have been upgraded to 3-car light rail.
And LRTs seem to be popping up all over the US too. Do you know the way to San Jose? It's light rail. That system's been around forever, but I was surprised on my last visit to Phoenix to see an LRT whiz by. That's about as car-centric a city as I could possibly imagine.
Thru regen braking, EVs reduce that (but bikes are even better!)
In fairness, regen braking is not all that common in ebikes, though some models do have it now. But bikes are better for the environment than cars in every way regardless.
Oh man really? That's hilarious! I'm glad Dad didn't shell out for a big spread in there then. It was just his name and that's it.
This reminds me a bit of that shady outfit that was promising to have a star named after you for a price. I was taking astronomy at the time and some friends asked me about it. I said NO! Don't even think about it. While there are way more stars in the Milky Way alone than there are people who have ever lived, astronomers are most certainly not in the business of naming them all. You can get a visiting comet named after you if you spot it first though.
I was at a used bookstore and there was this volume called the Who's Who Almanac or something to that effect. I was shocked to find my dad's name in there! He was an academic in a rather narrow discipline. I wouldn't say he was a prolific publisher or had any major discoveries under his name, but he spoke numerous languages and was well-travelled. To be fair, the book was essentially a giant list of names and didn't include bios or anything, so the bar might have been pretty low? But still…
I suppose Facebook, if only because it's the hardest to avoid for me. Friends, family, local businesses, charities, bands I follow, bands I play in, friggin everything is on FB and the feed is such a cesspool at this point. And the only thing that might have a snowball's chance in Hell of challenging its dominance is maybe Discord? Some of my friends seem to be spending more time there of late, and a few community groups I'm involved with have started their own too. But I dunno.
So the provincial priorities are to make it harder to ride a bike but easier to consume alcohol and drive. I am clearly not their target demographic.
I'm not familiar with how Netflix's ad tier works and am almost afraid to ask, but could someone ELI5?
If a company wanted to push an ad on Netflix, wouldn't it be up to them to decide whether to use AI make the thing? Or is this sort of the equivalent of a small business sending a script to the local radio station to have the DJ read it (i.e. rather than producing their own ad), except they add some AI-generated visuals?
lol Xcode. I miss the days of Metrowerks Codewarrior. I guess back then, the official Mac tool was some clunky shell environment. I can't even remember what it was called. But ironically, I'm more comfortable on the command line than in Xcode these days, which is not a shining endorsement for the latter.
Automator is kind of interesting though. I've been looking at it lately and it's pretty powerful once you figure it out. Again ironically, I've been using it mostly to manage terminal sessions in their own windows, so even though it's meant for gui scripting, I'm doing sort of command line on steroids with it. :p