Typical enshitification.
bad_news
It is telling that you are willing to subvert a message you agree with because the messenger doesn't tickle all your itches... one might characterize you as an ass. But I would never do that as it would be abrasive.
I'd argue eligible but non-voting voters are voting "fuck this sham" and ARE in fact voting with their non-vote against the system
It's funny because if this was about a woman it would be a Lifetime movie, but toxic males deserve only scorn.
Nick fucking Clegg, the man who singlehandedly killed the Lib Dems, handing Brexit, which his party was EXPLICITLY against to the Tories... I'd totally listen to this Midas but with shit opportunistic dumbass...
That's what I learned in CS, but that was last century. There is an entire field of hardware random number generators now, that may well be a scam, but I'd like to see SOME evidence before I accept that is a scam.
Yes, and most modern hardware afaik, includes hardware random number generators that use that random noise... so it IS random. I get that randomization functions produce "shadows" but we haven't relied on those in 20+ years sans hardware random number generation in most systems.
That's a very waxing philosophical basis on which to declare HRNGs a sham. If anyone had working proof of that, they'd be owning boxes across the web like during the 2000's Debian bad randoms issue.
As far as I'm aware, conventional computers have been producing true randoms for 20-odd years...
Remember if you use play services, Google has your IMEI, though.
The majority of eligible voters don't vote in the US
We need to send that terrorist migrant who assaulted American patriot Scott Bessent to El Salvador torture prison for life ASAP!