TheTechnician27

So this but Binky is a moth?

I don't think I should really have to explain this, but different prompts produce different results.

It's a two-pass solution, but it makes it a lot more reliable.

So your technique to "make it a lot more reliable" is to ask an LLM a question, then run the LLM's answer through an equally unreliable LLM to "verify" the answer?

We're so doomed.

Something I think you neglect in this comment is that yes, you're using LLMs in a responsible way. However, this doesn't translate well to school. The objective of homework isn't just to reproduce the correct answer. It isn't even to reproduce the steps to the correct answer. It's for you to learn the steps to the correct answer (and possibly the correct answer itself), and the reproduction of those steps is a "proof" to your teacher/professor that you put in the effort to do so. This way you have the foundation to learn other things as they come up in life.

For instance, if I'm in a class learning to read latitude and longitude, the teacher can give me an assignment to find 64° 8′ 55.03″ N, 21° 56′ 8.99″ W on the map and write where it is. If I want, I can just copy-paste that into OpenStreetMap right now and see what horrors await, but to actually learn, I need to manually track down where that is on the map. Because I learned to use latitude and longitude as a kid, I can verify what the computer is telling me, and I can imagine in my head roughly where that coordinate is without a map in front of me.

Learning without cheating lets you develop a good understanding of what you: 1) need to memorize, 2) don't need to memorize because you can reproduce it from other things you know, and 3) should just rely on an outside reference work for whenever you need it.

There's nuance to this, of course. Say, for example, that you cheat to find an answer because you just don't understand the problem, but afterward, you set aside the time to figure out how that answer came about so you can reproduce it yourself. That's still, in my opinion, a robust way to learn. But that kind of learning also requires very strict discipline.

The bottom two quadrants are indeed not making that up.

• Green is not making that up. Meat and animal products are abysmal for the environment. As an example from that study, see milk. As an isolated example people usually think of as innocent: honey in the US is produced by the European honeybee, an invasive species we brought over to outcompete and consequently decimate local honeybee populations. A whole-foods plant-based diet is the most environmentally sustainable diet. There are so many reasons that if I got into them, I may as well make a dedicated write-up with dozens of sources; sorry for pulling a Fermat.
• Yellow is not making that up. If you live in the US, meat and animal products are so relatively cheap thanks to 1) subsidies and 2) the fact that their economies of scale have essentially been pushed as far as possible*. Production of these items is not cheap. Even in spite of these overwhelming subsidies and economies of scale, a vegan and vegetarian diet is cheaper than a typical omnivorous one. On top of this, a massive, snowballing body of scientific evidence continues to show that a plant-based diet is healthier with respect to long-term health than a typical omnivorous one. If you consider your health a cost, then it's less costly to your wallet and to your body.

* EDIT: So far, in fact, that egg prices are now ballooning (recent drop due to imports etc.) from us packing birds so close together that commercial egg production has turned into a game of The Last of Clucks. Good job, humans. 🥳

OP, for future reference, any post without a source is subject to removal. This is yours: https://futurism.com/klarna-openai-humans-ai-back

There are better sources like the TechRadar one this Futurism article cites, but it's not bad enough to get removed for Rule 2 or anything.

Currently, Karton is actively developed by Derek Lin, a University of Waterloo student participating in Google Summer of Code 2025. His primary aim is to deliver a virtual machine manager that truly belongs in the KDE ecosystem.

Neat, but celebrating this as "finally getting" seems premature at best.

Calling her comics mid as fuck? I mean they are, but that isn't "drama".

But we're not...? Someone just asked "what's the drama?" and someone matter-of-factly said what the drama is. What makes you think anything here is imitating Reddit?

Eagerly waiting for the 2.0 update where Saddam has intact balls and the astronaut has a Saddam Hussein patch.

That's her biggest platform by far, so I think what they said is fair game. Does Mastodon never talk about what happens on Twitter or BlueSky? The fact Reddit is a cesspool doesn't mean we should pretend it doesn't exist.