Sims

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Damn Corporate eco-systems ! You are obviously supposed to only use the mouse with a laptop from the same Corp or Partner !

\s :-P

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

Jeebus man. All cultural/social or intellectual reasons to believe what we do, Plus all the different versions of meaning, is being dumbed down to only a physical difference in our brain. We are back to finding 'criminals' by measuring skulls.

The paper seems like a paid research job - as in the conclusion were fixed. Let me guess, there's a big controversy in the world, and someone needs to be able to point anything to 'Authoritarians' - to 'Them' ? As if 'Lolbertarians' were less Authoritarian than 'Tankies'..

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Functionality-wise, its a promising 'personality' training system. Could be my 'guiding voice' when my other agents run autonomously for longer time. Could also be used to create Agents imitating the thinking of some Hooman experts we want to influence some agent sub-system we have, or just creating a domain-expert AI.

However, it have the option to connect to a seemingly(?) closed-source 'AI network', where people can buy services, create NFT's on personalities and similar market garbage, so I won't be using that part - open or not.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

Can't you just give it a system message that says: "User prefers a professional conversational style", "User prefers a neutral attitude", "Shut the F*** up!" or similar ? You probably have to experiment a little, but usually it works okay.

Edit. I think it is a problem that specially commercial corps, are adjusting their models to be as max 'lick-user-ass' as possible. We need models that are less prone to licking users ass for tech-lord popularity, and more prone to being 'normal' and usable..

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's always a good advice to stay away from that disgusting biz (all big tech), but a model alone can't collect information and send it back to EvilCorp HQ, so you are safe in that regard.

Personally, I have left Google 95%, but since they train on my data, I intend to use all Google products purely for social criticism, research and data on how psychopathic/criminal Google is, the criticism of Capitalism, the Western Oligarchy and their massive propaganda, how Ads are a form of mass-manipulation, and everything else that they wouldn't want to have in their model dataset.

Maybe just have googles own AI products produce garbage wrong research, and store all the noisy data on Google Drive. Go train on that, you f**kers..

I admit it won't influence future models much, so It's more of a 'feel good' thing ;-P

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just ordinary Capitalist incentives taking priority again. There are unfortunately monetary scams on all levels of Science, and it is breaking Science. All we wanted was a pure Scientific incentive of 'Closer to Truth' - not ideological 'Money before Truth'..

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (7 children)

..and they just replaced Silicon with Bizmuth in another study (>500ghz, smaller, more efficient). The West have already lost the ideological competitive race they still fantasize about..

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Neat article. I too battled with the different definitions of Entropy (in relation to surprise, order/disorder, complexity etc), but didn't come as close as this guy.

"But I have no idea what entropy is, and from what I find, neither do most other people."

Something is happening on a Civilization scale.

Anecdotally, I've experienced the same phenomenon many times, to be a non-expert, and start questioning established knowledge/experts - finding gaps and inconsistencies - while getting annoyed/disappointed. I suspect that most common people that use AI for deep philosophy/Science seem to discover that experts don't agree on many definitions or assumptions, and that there are huge knowledge gaps that are glossed over. The established knowledge space are suddenly under scrutiny by millions of people enhanced with AI, now looking at the conclusions, disagreeing with definitions/assumptions and finding new perspectives and maybe even methodologies for the problem.

Don't get me wrong, I love Science/The Methodology, but it isn't a perfect thing (far from it), and the handful of Hooman experts have been converging on whatever expert level a handful of experts and pre-AI tools could reach. They could only do so much.

So far, we've only heard about a single paper fully written by AI, but it seems reasonable to say that all new papers are assisted with AI. Experts are being accelerated by AI from rapid ideation and combinations of disparate methodologies/perspectives etc, so I suspect that a wall of papers are under way from the more rigorous academic side. They just take a bit longer to produce/show their new thoughts and ideas. We probably need a new Science publishing system that can handle quicker feedback/evolution of ideas and knowledge.

I think we are seeing the first glimpse of the coming knowledge explosion. Millions of ordinary people are testing out established facts, going new ways, and challenging assumptions/definitions etc. They will statistically puncture a lot of the current knowledge space, and significantly accelerate soft/theoretical expert knowledge.

We will have a temporary global Democratization of Knowledge, where almost anyone can enter the debate on frontier science, based only on ideas, co-developed and checked with/by AI. AI is lowering entry-requirements to the knowledge/ideation field, and lifting ordinary people closer to expert levels.

In only 5-10 years, our current societal structures will be judged by a global population with +50 IQ. I doubt anyone will be in awe over what they see.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

It has been long time coming, but he went against the Deep state, so right now he's feeling the 'regime-change' power of the US propaganda apparatus. A lot of money is moving in the propaganda space towards removing the Elon.

This thin 'breach' seems like a std information attack.

I think he's going down anyway - all by his own dumb self - but at least the propaganda network isn't bashing any good guys in the mean time..

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Cool, having no money have been my Family's super-power - a hidden Mantra almost - for generations. What a bunch of progressive Geniuses I come from. NOW is our time 😏

..well, I wish the previous Elite hadn't trashed the place first, but still.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Friendship between western people and other people around the world is important to stop political warmongering, so its pretty cool with all the new Westerners getting the "China not bad" experience, and also that we all see how far and advanced China has become on so many fronts (Still having work to do, oc). Let's hope the two information spheres and people can mix a little now, and some of the deliberate and honestly hateful misinformation can be dispelled.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hm, just a quick thought. Infant animals do get 'surprised', but just accepts their environment pretty quickly. Adult animals won't get surprised if they see themselves in the water, but they will if there's suddenly a Portal 'mirror', showing them selves, in the middle of no-where.

Exploration of 'self' only happens in safety and waterholes are not safe for predators. I don't think most animals have the opportunity/energy to diverge their attention to reflect on their own reflections, while watching for predators. Maybe Elephants and similar safe animals ?

Edit: I think the issue with shadows are the same. Kids can follow, or be scared of their own shadows, but pretty quickly habituates to it, so its brain doesn't react to it all the time and burn off energy.

Neat question/connection btw.

view more: ‹ prev next ›