OldWoodFrame

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Forgot to say "sudo"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you won't accept the results of an investigation, then why call for one in the first place. You can do one or the other, but both is dumb. Don't move the goalposts, just admit that you think X happened and you are now rejecting any evidence you disagree with.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago

My point is that it's very odd to focus on the Democrats specifically when Republicans brought the bills up for a vote, and Republicans also basically unanimously voted for it...more Republicans voted for it than Democrats, and a Republican president is signing the bill.

Republicans pushed it through, Democrats voted for it also. You are allowed to criticize either party for voting for it, but you are being inaccurate if you are saying the Democrats are disproportionately responsible for passage, as the term "pushed it through" means.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

Republicans pass legislation through the two houses of Congress they entirely control, a Republican president signs it.

You: "The Democrats pushed this through."

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

They exist for the important work of censoring critics.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

There was a police investigation.

They just didn't investigate Boeing about it because the police investigation determined they weren't involved.

If you truly believe there should be investigations, you have to accept when the results of the investigations don't match your expectations. That's why we have investigations.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My town had an extremely generically named "spa" that I passed by all the time and joked that it must be a drug ring and I found out that no actually they were a human trafficking ring and they got shut down by the police.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's not pearl clutching, I'm saying it's not a well designed comic. If he wanted it to be about Covid, he could have drawn it that way.

As seen by how you're saying "no, people died of Covid" and other people are saying "no, people are being deported" and you both are at least notionally interpreting this political cartoon that has labels, none of which mention any of that proves you have to make one too many leaps in logic.

It's just generic "Trump bad" which like I said, I agree with, I just don't like the cartoon.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I hate the schadenfreude journalism. I will never meet this guy, I don't care how he feels any more than some random South Dakotan. The reason he's relevant is his outsized impact on government and the country, tell me about that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

The smeg CFG01, so good I call it the mother of all grinders. A real smeg ma.

view more: next ›