AdrianTheFrog

Computers are still advancing roughly exponentially, as they have been for the last 40 years (Moore's law). AI is being carried with that and still making many occasional gains on top of that. The thing with exponential growth is that it doesn't necessarily need to feel fast. It's always growing at the same rate percentage wise, definitionally.

People estimate ~100 million, which is still a lot. Of course it's worth noting that they weren't attempting to launch a payload or really recover much of anything, so the only real cost of failure is that they might need to launch more test flights later than they otherwise would have had to.

Apparently estimated total development costs are probably a bit less than half of the Artemis program cost, although the Artemis program has actually developed a fully functional and reliable rocket by now. So it's hard to say if SpaceX's development method will be cheaper in the long run. (Discounting the later manufacturing costs because I don't see any reason why a more ULA, Blue Origin, or NASA-like development process wouldn't still be capable of producing a cheap rocket if that was the focus)

Honestly losing to the US military industrial complex in development cost would be pretty embarrassing. (Congress makes NASA use all the MIC suppliers for their rockets)

lol I had no idea they use H in some places

it seems a little weird but I guess the exact placement of letters isn't really all that impactful when you aren't in c major anyways (where the alphabet would correspond to a scale)

the luxcore render plugin has much faster converging caustics (does some photon mapping/bidirectional stuff iirc)

It's also open source!

You're still perfectly visible in shadows and reflections. Anyone who catches you in a mirror will see you completely naked.

Ambient light occlusion counts too, the area covered by your feet looks perfectly black.

Edit: You can create this scenario pretty easily in Blender. Here's what it might look like:

Is that a term people use to describe eating in real life? Not just Minecraft?

The ice created has an index of refraction of 1 and extremely low surface reflectivity. It is almost impossible to see and can appear anywhere within 5 meters of you.

Does a capacitor count?

xkcd.com/1203

Implying he isn't right wing anymore, or just not openly?

I agree with most of the stuff he says, he just doesn't seem very nuanced and I find the angry tone slightly off-putting. I like NJB tho, probably because he's just sarcastic at some points for effect.

It's for transferring pictures over the wifi network or a local wifi network that the camera is hosting. If you have the SD card plugged in, there's absolutely no reason to use the app instead of your phone's file manager. I don't even think the app will recognize an SD card, but I don't really know. It might recognize a plugged in camera, but it doesn't advertise that and I've never tried.

There's not really anything you need the app for. It can remote control the camera with a live feed, which is cool but not all that useful, at least for me. It can also transfer images and videos, but I'm not sure it does the videos at full resolution, at least in my camera. For all practical purposes it's just a little less useful than carrying a USB C SD card reader around with your camera that you can plug into your phone (because it also takes a good minute to connect usually, but my only datapoint is a camera from 2014 so they might have improved it since then)