136
Ever-rising height of car bonnets a ‘clear threat’ to children, report says
(www.theguardian.com)
Yeah we're well beyond children now...
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
136 points (99.3% liked)
Fuck Cars
1232 readers
1 users here now
Your hub for collection of materials that contribute to a world with less car ownership. Including buses, motorcycles, bicycles, skateboards, longboards, scooters, hoverboards, e-scooters, pedestrians, walking, running.
Learn
- AboutHere - Videos to understand your city better. Creator is based out of Vancouver, BC.
- NotJustBikes - Stories of successful and not so successful urban planning.
- RMTransit - In-depth analysis of public transit systems around the world.
- Cycling Fallacies
Basic Rules:
- be constructive: there is no need of another internet space full of competition, negativity, rage etc.;
- no bigotry, including racism, sexism, ableism, transphobia, homophobia or xenophobia;
- be empathic: empathy is more rebellious than a middle finger;
- no porn and no gore: let’s keep this place easy to manage;
- no ads / spamming / flooding, we don’t want to buy/consume your commodified ideas;
- occasional self-promotion by active members is fine.
Chat
Get Involved
- Alberta - Alberta Cycling Coalition
- Edmonton - Bike Edmonton
- British Columbia - The BC Cycling Coalition
- Vancouver - HUB Cycling
- Victoria - Capital Bike
- Manitoba
- Winnipeg - Bike Winnipeg
- Ontario - Share the Road Cycling Coalition
- Ottawa - Bike Ottawa
- Toronto - CycleToronto
- Quebec - Vélo Québec
- Saskatchewan
- Saskatoon - Saskatoon Cycles
* message the mods to add any missing local advocacy groups.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I remember watching a Simpsons episode about how deadly big cars are back when I was like, young. At least 15 years ago. We've known this for so long, how is it so difficult to just set a maximum height commuter vehicles?
(It's a rhetorical question, but it anyone has an actual answer then count me curious.)
We've known this for so long, how is it so difficult to just set a maximum height commuter vehicles?
Because the United States EPA designed fuel efficiency regulations in a fucked-up way that incentivizes manufacturers to produce larger and larger trucks.
This may be true about the US. What's the UK's excuse?
Tories wanting to copy American “culture” design without thought.
Generally speaking, true. But specifically hood height and forward visibility is purely aesthetics. They are marketing "tough" as that big grill, and they want that "chopped" look where the windows are very short relative to the rest of the body.
"You want to buy a Chelsea tractor? OK, as long as you know and accept the consequences." Only let them buy 4x4s that come with a wrap like the kind you get on cigarettes, but instead showing injuries and deaths to pedestrians caused by 4x4s.
" STUPIDLY LARGE VEHICLES KILL CHILDREN "
Get your kids their Tesla Stilts ©️