this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025
275 points (99.3% liked)

politics

24084 readers
3506 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Philadelphia Inquirer’s editorial board has issued a sharp rebuke of Pennsylvania senator John Fetterman in a new opinion piece, urging him to take his job “seriously” and writing that “it’s time for Fetterman to serve Pennsylvanians, or step away.”

In a strongly worded piece published on Sunday, the editorial board of the Philadelphia Inquirer, which endorsed Fetterman during his 2022 Senate campaign, said the first-term Democrat “has missed more votes than nearly every other senator in the past two years” and “regularly skips committee hearings, cancels meetings, avoids the daily caucus lunches with colleagues, and rarely goes on the Senate floor”.

The editorial board also wrote that six former Fetterman staffers told an Inquirer reporter that Fetterman was frequently absent or spent hours alone in his office, avoiding colleagues and meetings.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 107 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Fetterman turned conservative after his stroke. His lack of participation in the Senate and change in stance after a major health episode should bring his competency into question.

It’s incredibly sad, because he was so promising in the early days. He is not the Senator everyone voted for.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 week ago (1 children)

so promising in the early days.

About that... Some more news did a whole episode on his career showing that he's been an opportunistic grifter this whole time.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Some more news is awesome.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

brain damage causes conservatism

That's my takeaway here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Ye'olde worm-brain is another example

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

GOP hit him with the secret stroke beam that makes you conservative

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As opposed to the secret stroke beam that gets you a meeting with HR.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I thought it was *non-*secret stroking that got you a meeting with HR.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

My stepdad went maga after getting a brain tumor. Wish I was making that up.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fetterman needs to choke on a bag of dicks.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That would be a waste of good dicks. Let him suffocate on the bag.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Amen. In this economy, that bag of dicks could feed a family of 7.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

that bag of dicks could feed a family of 7

Next up, in The Naked Chef with Jamie Oliver!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Noooooo. Not the chili jam!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago